2010 Great West Conference Softball

Team Statistics
Overall Statistics


2010 Great West Conference Softball
Conference Overall Statistics (as of May 18, 2010)
(All games Sorted by Batting avg)


Team                   AVG   G   AB   R   H  2B  3B  HR RBI  BB HBP  SO  SB-ATT 

Utah Valley.........  .306  58 1567 325 480  87  10  46 299 139  20 249  37-54  
North Dakota........  .269  51 1287 187 346  50   9  30 161 131  17 292  70-92  
Houston Baptist.....  .239  45 1146 120 274  42   5  14 106  83  11 190  16-16  
South Dakota........  .225  52 1297 169 292  52   4  30 146 122  28 319  22-36  

Totals..............  .263 206 5297 801 1392 231  28 120 712 475  76 1050 145-198 

CI - USD 1. 

(All games Sorted by Earned run avg)

Team                   ERA   W-L     G  CG SHO/CBO SV    IP   H   R  ER  BB  SO 

Houston Baptist.....  3.62  16-28   45  34   8/3    1 291.0 297 160 117  90 255 
South Dakota........  4.80  20-30   52  30   5/0    1 335.2 382 227 179 198 206 
North Dakota........  5.50  16-35   51  28   5/1    1 321.0 411 272 196 125 214 
Utah Valley.........  6.01  28-30   58  25   1/0    2 373.0 481 314 249 168 178 

Totals..............  5.05  80-123 206 117  19/4    5 1320.2 1571 973 741 581 853 

PB - Sioux 23, USD 19, UVU 10, HBU 6. Pickoffs - USD 3, UVU 1. 

(All games Sorted by Fielding pct)

 Team                     C   PO   A   E   FLD%  DPs  SBA CSB   SBA%   PB  CI  

 Houston Baptist.....  1227  873 300  54   .956   12   55  17   .764    6   0  
 South Dakota........  1503 1007 429  67   .955    8   62  18   .775   19   1  
 Utah Valley.........  1757 1119 541  97   .945   18   44  18   .710   10   0  
 North Dakota........  1476  963 427  86   .942   19   43  16   .729   23   0  

 Totals..............  5963     1697       .949       204       .747        1
                            3962     304          57       69          58





Category Leaders


2010 Great West Conference Softball
Conference Batting Leaders (as of May 18, 2010)
(All games)

Hitting minimums - 1.0 AB/Game   
Pitching minimums - 1 Games   1.0 IP/Game   

Batting avg
-----------
1. Utah Valley.........  .306
2. North Dakota........  .269
3. Houston Baptist.....  .239
4. South Dakota........  .225
 
Slugging pct
------------
1. Utah Valley.........  .463
2. North Dakota........  .392
3. South Dakota........  .341
4. Houston Baptist.....  .321
 
On base pct
-----------
1. Utah Valley.........  .367
2. North Dakota........  .344
3. South Dakota........  .305
4. Houston Baptist.....  .295
 
Runs scored
-----------
1. Utah Valley.........  325
2. North Dakota........  187
3. South Dakota........  169
4. Houston Baptist.....  120
 
Hits
----
1. Utah Valley.........  480
2. North Dakota........  346
3. South Dakota........  292
4. Houston Baptist.....  274
 
Runs batted in
--------------
1. Utah Valley.........  299
2. North Dakota........  161
3. South Dakota........  146
4. Houston Baptist.....  106
 
Doubles
-------
1. Utah Valley.........   87
2. South Dakota........   52
3. North Dakota........   50
4. Houston Baptist.....   42
 
Triples
-------
1. Utah Valley.........   10
2. North Dakota........    9
3. Houston Baptist.....    5
4. South Dakota........    4
 
Home runs
---------
1. Utah Valley.........   46
2. North Dakota........   30
   South Dakota........   30
4. Houston Baptist.....   14
 
Total bases
-----------
1. Utah Valley.........  725
2. North Dakota........  504
3. South Dakota........  442
4. Houston Baptist.....  368
 

Total plate appearances
-----------------------
1. Utah Valley......... 1782
2. North Dakota........ 1496
   South Dakota........ 1496
4. Houston Baptist..... 1282
 
At bats
-------
1. Utah Valley......... 1567
2. South Dakota........ 1297
3. North Dakota........ 1287
4. Houston Baptist..... 1146
 
Walks
-----
1. Utah Valley.........  139
2. North Dakota........  131
3. South Dakota........  122
4. Houston Baptist.....   83
 
Hit by pitch
------------
1. South Dakota........   28
2. Utah Valley.........   20
3. North Dakota........   17
4. Houston Baptist.....   11
 
Strikeouts
----------
1. South Dakota........  319
2. North Dakota........  292
3. Utah Valley.........  249
4. Houston Baptist.....  190
 
Sac bunts
---------
1. North Dakota........   55
2. South Dakota........   47
3. Utah Valley.........   40
4. Houston Baptist.....   36
 
Sac flies
---------
1. Utah Valley.........   16
2. Houston Baptist.....    6
3. North Dakota........    3
4. South Dakota........    2
 
Stolen bases
------------
1. North Dakota........   70
2. Utah Valley.........   37
3. South Dakota........   22
4. Houston Baptist.....   16
 
Caught stealing
---------------
1. North Dakota........   22
2. Utah Valley.........   17
3. South Dakota........   14
 
Steal attempts
--------------
1. North Dakota........   92
2. Utah Valley.........   54
3. South Dakota........   36
4. Houston Baptist.....   16
 

Grounded into DP
----------------
1. Utah Valley.........    7
2. South Dakota........    4
3. North Dakota........    2
4. Houston Baptist.....    1
 


2010 Great West Conference Softball
Conference Pitching Leaders (as of May 18, 2010)
(All games)

Hitting minimums - 1.0 AB/Game   
Pitching minimums - 1 Games   1.0 IP/Game   

Earned run avg
--------------
1. Houston Baptist.....  3.62
2. South Dakota........  4.80
3. North Dakota........  5.50
4. Utah Valley.........  6.01
 
Opposing bat avg
----------------
1. Houston Baptist.....  .261
2. South Dakota........  .290
3. North Dakota........  .311
4. Utah Valley.........  .311
 
Innings pitched
---------------
1. Utah Valley......... 373.0
2. South Dakota........ 335.2
3. North Dakota........ 321.0
4. Houston Baptist..... 291.0
 
Batters struck out
------------------
1. Houston Baptist.....  255
2. North Dakota........  214
3. South Dakota........  206
4. Utah Valley.........  178
 
Batters SO out looking
----------------------
1. Houston Baptist.....   68
2. Utah Valley.........   62
3. South Dakota........   58
4. North Dakota........   52
 
Wins
----
1. Utah Valley.........   28
2. South Dakota........   20
3. Houston Baptist.....   16
   North Dakota........   16
 
Losses
------
1. North Dakota........   35
2. South Dakota........   30
   Utah Valley.........   30
4. Houston Baptist.....   28
 
Saves
-----
1. Utah Valley.........    2
2. South Dakota........    1
   Houston Baptist.....    1
   North Dakota........    1
 
Runners picked off
------------------
1. South Dakota........    3
2. Utah Valley.........    1
 
Sac bunts allowed
-----------------
1. South Dakota........   67
2. Utah Valley.........   52
   North Dakota........   52
4. Houston Baptist.....   32
 

Sac flies allowed
-----------------
1. Utah Valley.........   18
2. North Dakota........   12
3. South Dakota........    9
4. Houston Baptist.....    5
 
Hits allowed
------------
1. Houston Baptist.....  297
2. South Dakota........  382
3. North Dakota........  411
4. Utah Valley.........  481
 
Runs allowed
------------
1. Houston Baptist.....  160
2. South Dakota........  227
3. North Dakota........  272
4. Utah Valley.........  314
 
Earned runs allowed
-------------------
1. Houston Baptist.....  117
2. South Dakota........  179
3. North Dakota........  196
4. Utah Valley.........  249
 
Walks allowed
-------------
1. Houston Baptist.....   90
2. North Dakota........  125
3. Utah Valley.........  168
4. South Dakota........  198
 
Doubles allowed
---------------
1. Houston Baptist.....   48
2. South Dakota........   49
3. North Dakota........   53
4. Utah Valley.........   77
 
Triples allowed
---------------
1. South Dakota........    3
2. Houston Baptist.....    6
3. North Dakota........    8
4. Utah Valley.........   20
 
Home runs allowed
-----------------
1. Houston Baptist.....   24
2. South Dakota........   26
3. North Dakota........   37
4. Utah Valley.........   41
 
Wild pitches
------------
1. Utah Valley.........   50
   North Dakota........   50
3. South Dakota........   15
4. Houston Baptist.....    6
 
Balks
-----
1. Utah Valley.........   17
2. North Dakota........    9
3. Houston Baptist.....    7
   South Dakota........    7
 

Hit batters
-----------
1. North Dakota........   31
2. Houston Baptist.....   28
3. Utah Valley.........   17
4. South Dakota........   10
 
Intentional BB allowed
----------------------
 


2010 Great West Conference Softball
Conference Fielding Leaders (as of May 18, 2010)
(All games)

Pitching minimums - 1 Games   1.0 IP/Game   

Fielding pct
------------
1. Houston Baptist.....  .956
2. South Dakota........  .955
3. Utah Valley.........  .945
4. North Dakota........  .942
 
Chances
-------
1. Utah Valley......... 1757
2. South Dakota........ 1503
3. North Dakota........ 1476
4. Houston Baptist..... 1227
 
Putouts
-------
1. Utah Valley......... 1119
2. South Dakota........ 1007
3. North Dakota........  963
4. Houston Baptist.....  873
 
Assists
-------
1. Utah Valley.........  541
2. South Dakota........  429
3. North Dakota........  427
4. Houston Baptist.....  300
 
Errors
------
1. Utah Valley.........   97
2. North Dakota........   86
3. South Dakota........   67
4. Houston Baptist.....   54
 
Fielding double plays
---------------------
1. North Dakota........   19
2. Utah Valley.........   18
3. Houston Baptist.....   12
4. South Dakota........    8
 
Stolen bases against
--------------------
1. South Dakota........   62
2. Houston Baptist.....   55
3. Utah Valley.........   44
4. North Dakota........   43
 
Caught stealing by
------------------
1. South Dakota........   18
   Utah Valley.........   18
3. Houston Baptist.....   17
4. North Dakota........   16
 
Steal attempts against
----------------------
1. South Dakota........   80
2. Houston Baptist.....   72
3. Utah Valley.........   62
4. North Dakota........   59
 
Passed balls
------------
1. North Dakota........   23
2. South Dakota........   19
3. Utah Valley.........   10
4. Houston Baptist.....    6
 

Catchers interference
---------------------
1. South Dakota........    1