
2010 Great West Conference Softball
Team Statistics
Overall Statistics
2010 Great West Conference Softball
Conference Overall Statistics (as of May 18, 2010)
(All games Sorted by Batting avg)
Team AVG G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB HBP SO SB-ATT
Utah Valley......... .306 58 1567 325 480 87 10 46 299 139 20 249 37-54
North Dakota........ .269 51 1287 187 346 50 9 30 161 131 17 292 70-92
Houston Baptist..... .239 45 1146 120 274 42 5 14 106 83 11 190 16-16
South Dakota........ .225 52 1297 169 292 52 4 30 146 122 28 319 22-36
Totals.............. .263 206 5297 801 1392 231 28 120 712 475 76 1050 145-198
CI - USD 1.
(All games Sorted by Earned run avg)
Team ERA W-L G CG SHO/CBO SV IP H R ER BB SO
Houston Baptist..... 3.62 16-28 45 34 8/3 1 291.0 297 160 117 90 255
South Dakota........ 4.80 20-30 52 30 5/0 1 335.2 382 227 179 198 206
North Dakota........ 5.50 16-35 51 28 5/1 1 321.0 411 272 196 125 214
Utah Valley......... 6.01 28-30 58 25 1/0 2 373.0 481 314 249 168 178
Totals.............. 5.05 80-123 206 117 19/4 5 1320.2 1571 973 741 581 853
PB - Sioux 23, USD 19, UVU 10, HBU 6. Pickoffs - USD 3, UVU 1.
(All games Sorted by Fielding pct)
Team C PO A E FLD% DPs SBA CSB SBA% PB CI
Houston Baptist..... 1227 873 300 54 .956 12 55 17 .764 6 0
South Dakota........ 1503 1007 429 67 .955 8 62 18 .775 19 1
Utah Valley......... 1757 1119 541 97 .945 18 44 18 .710 10 0
North Dakota........ 1476 963 427 86 .942 19 43 16 .729 23 0
Totals.............. 5963 1697 .949 204 .747 1
3962 304 57 69 58
Category Leaders
2010 Great West Conference Softball
Conference Batting Leaders (as of May 18, 2010)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 1.0 AB/Game
Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game
Batting avg
-----------
1. Utah Valley......... .306
2. North Dakota........ .269
3. Houston Baptist..... .239
4. South Dakota........ .225
Slugging pct
------------
1. Utah Valley......... .463
2. North Dakota........ .392
3. South Dakota........ .341
4. Houston Baptist..... .321
On base pct
-----------
1. Utah Valley......... .367
2. North Dakota........ .344
3. South Dakota........ .305
4. Houston Baptist..... .295
Runs scored
-----------
1. Utah Valley......... 325
2. North Dakota........ 187
3. South Dakota........ 169
4. Houston Baptist..... 120
Hits
----
1. Utah Valley......... 480
2. North Dakota........ 346
3. South Dakota........ 292
4. Houston Baptist..... 274
Runs batted in
--------------
1. Utah Valley......... 299
2. North Dakota........ 161
3. South Dakota........ 146
4. Houston Baptist..... 106
Doubles
-------
1. Utah Valley......... 87
2. South Dakota........ 52
3. North Dakota........ 50
4. Houston Baptist..... 42
Triples
-------
1. Utah Valley......... 10
2. North Dakota........ 9
3. Houston Baptist..... 5
4. South Dakota........ 4
Home runs
---------
1. Utah Valley......... 46
2. North Dakota........ 30
South Dakota........ 30
4. Houston Baptist..... 14
Total bases
-----------
1. Utah Valley......... 725
2. North Dakota........ 504
3. South Dakota........ 442
4. Houston Baptist..... 368
Total plate appearances
-----------------------
1. Utah Valley......... 1782
2. North Dakota........ 1496
South Dakota........ 1496
4. Houston Baptist..... 1282
At bats
-------
1. Utah Valley......... 1567
2. South Dakota........ 1297
3. North Dakota........ 1287
4. Houston Baptist..... 1146
Walks
-----
1. Utah Valley......... 139
2. North Dakota........ 131
3. South Dakota........ 122
4. Houston Baptist..... 83
Hit by pitch
------------
1. South Dakota........ 28
2. Utah Valley......... 20
3. North Dakota........ 17
4. Houston Baptist..... 11
Strikeouts
----------
1. South Dakota........ 319
2. North Dakota........ 292
3. Utah Valley......... 249
4. Houston Baptist..... 190
Sac bunts
---------
1. North Dakota........ 55
2. South Dakota........ 47
3. Utah Valley......... 40
4. Houston Baptist..... 36
Sac flies
---------
1. Utah Valley......... 16
2. Houston Baptist..... 6
3. North Dakota........ 3
4. South Dakota........ 2
Stolen bases
------------
1. North Dakota........ 70
2. Utah Valley......... 37
3. South Dakota........ 22
4. Houston Baptist..... 16
Caught stealing
---------------
1. North Dakota........ 22
2. Utah Valley......... 17
3. South Dakota........ 14
Steal attempts
--------------
1. North Dakota........ 92
2. Utah Valley......... 54
3. South Dakota........ 36
4. Houston Baptist..... 16
Grounded into DP
----------------
1. Utah Valley......... 7
2. South Dakota........ 4
3. North Dakota........ 2
4. Houston Baptist..... 1
2010 Great West Conference Softball
Conference Pitching Leaders (as of May 18, 2010)
(All games)
Hitting minimums - 1.0 AB/Game
Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game
Earned run avg
--------------
1. Houston Baptist..... 3.62
2. South Dakota........ 4.80
3. North Dakota........ 5.50
4. Utah Valley......... 6.01
Opposing bat avg
----------------
1. Houston Baptist..... .261
2. South Dakota........ .290
3. North Dakota........ .311
4. Utah Valley......... .311
Innings pitched
---------------
1. Utah Valley......... 373.0
2. South Dakota........ 335.2
3. North Dakota........ 321.0
4. Houston Baptist..... 291.0
Batters struck out
------------------
1. Houston Baptist..... 255
2. North Dakota........ 214
3. South Dakota........ 206
4. Utah Valley......... 178
Batters SO out looking
----------------------
1. Houston Baptist..... 68
2. Utah Valley......... 62
3. South Dakota........ 58
4. North Dakota........ 52
Wins
----
1. Utah Valley......... 28
2. South Dakota........ 20
3. Houston Baptist..... 16
North Dakota........ 16
Losses
------
1. North Dakota........ 35
2. South Dakota........ 30
Utah Valley......... 30
4. Houston Baptist..... 28
Saves
-----
1. Utah Valley......... 2
2. South Dakota........ 1
Houston Baptist..... 1
North Dakota........ 1
Runners picked off
------------------
1. South Dakota........ 3
2. Utah Valley......... 1
Sac bunts allowed
-----------------
1. South Dakota........ 67
2. Utah Valley......... 52
North Dakota........ 52
4. Houston Baptist..... 32
Sac flies allowed
-----------------
1. Utah Valley......... 18
2. North Dakota........ 12
3. South Dakota........ 9
4. Houston Baptist..... 5
Hits allowed
------------
1. Houston Baptist..... 297
2. South Dakota........ 382
3. North Dakota........ 411
4. Utah Valley......... 481
Runs allowed
------------
1. Houston Baptist..... 160
2. South Dakota........ 227
3. North Dakota........ 272
4. Utah Valley......... 314
Earned runs allowed
-------------------
1. Houston Baptist..... 117
2. South Dakota........ 179
3. North Dakota........ 196
4. Utah Valley......... 249
Walks allowed
-------------
1. Houston Baptist..... 90
2. North Dakota........ 125
3. Utah Valley......... 168
4. South Dakota........ 198
Doubles allowed
---------------
1. Houston Baptist..... 48
2. South Dakota........ 49
3. North Dakota........ 53
4. Utah Valley......... 77
Triples allowed
---------------
1. South Dakota........ 3
2. Houston Baptist..... 6
3. North Dakota........ 8
4. Utah Valley......... 20
Home runs allowed
-----------------
1. Houston Baptist..... 24
2. South Dakota........ 26
3. North Dakota........ 37
4. Utah Valley......... 41
Wild pitches
------------
1. Utah Valley......... 50
North Dakota........ 50
3. South Dakota........ 15
4. Houston Baptist..... 6
Balks
-----
1. Utah Valley......... 17
2. North Dakota........ 9
3. Houston Baptist..... 7
South Dakota........ 7
Hit batters
-----------
1. North Dakota........ 31
2. Houston Baptist..... 28
3. Utah Valley......... 17
4. South Dakota........ 10
Intentional BB allowed
----------------------
2010 Great West Conference Softball
Conference Fielding Leaders (as of May 18, 2010)
(All games)
Pitching minimums - 1 Games 1.0 IP/Game
Fielding pct
------------
1. Houston Baptist..... .956
2. South Dakota........ .955
3. Utah Valley......... .945
4. North Dakota........ .942
Chances
-------
1. Utah Valley......... 1757
2. South Dakota........ 1503
3. North Dakota........ 1476
4. Houston Baptist..... 1227
Putouts
-------
1. Utah Valley......... 1119
2. South Dakota........ 1007
3. North Dakota........ 963
4. Houston Baptist..... 873
Assists
-------
1. Utah Valley......... 541
2. South Dakota........ 429
3. North Dakota........ 427
4. Houston Baptist..... 300
Errors
------
1. Utah Valley......... 97
2. North Dakota........ 86
3. South Dakota........ 67
4. Houston Baptist..... 54
Fielding double plays
---------------------
1. North Dakota........ 19
2. Utah Valley......... 18
3. Houston Baptist..... 12
4. South Dakota........ 8
Stolen bases against
--------------------
1. South Dakota........ 62
2. Houston Baptist..... 55
3. Utah Valley......... 44
4. North Dakota........ 43
Caught stealing by
------------------
1. South Dakota........ 18
Utah Valley......... 18
3. Houston Baptist..... 17
4. North Dakota........ 16
Steal attempts against
----------------------
1. South Dakota........ 80
2. Houston Baptist..... 72
3. Utah Valley......... 62
4. North Dakota........ 59
Passed balls
------------
1. North Dakota........ 23
2. South Dakota........ 19
3. Utah Valley......... 10
4. Houston Baptist..... 6
Catchers interference
---------------------
1. South Dakota........ 1